The Planet Is Not Flat. End of Story.
Dear Mr Chiarini,
I am a new member and I believe the Earth is round and concave, and motionless.
This attained closure emerges from literature that I inspect currently. It is a new announcement which enticed me with its validity.
I will not reveal its name to you for fear of derision.
I admire and respect your work. However I will need time to be convinced of its efficacy.
For the moment, I remain neutral but extremely interested.
I do immerse you in deference.
I cant help but laugh that in the paragraph (and probably rest of the article) where you are specifically talking about how smart globe heads are and how stupid anyone that believes in religion is, your entire text is full of typos. I am not normally one to point out typos, but when you are trying to convince the world of how smart you and other people that buy the spinning globe rhetoric, you might want to actually use correct grammar and spelling, lol, just saying, it certainly doesn't help your case.
Glad i found this, i was just arguing with a flat earther on youtube lastnight lol...Thank You
When the flat earthers say they can see the ship that has passed over the horizon when they use binoculars, then technically they should be able to stand on an elevated surface with a telescope and track the ship across the ocean till it reaches Hawai. ALSO by their own claims then when the sun sets behind the horizon you should be able to use binoculars to then keep tracking it. But you can't because the earth is not flat.
1 The Sunlight goes through the strong magnetic field of the north pole, and the sunlight turns orange. And that light then hits the moon.
haha haha haha
2. Since the sunlight is orange, it makes the moon appear orange as in this image-
The sunlight is not orange That atmosphere is made up of a mixture of gaseous molecules, mostly nitrogen and oxygen, with some water vapor and trace gasses thrown in. These molecules clumped more densely close to Earth where the atmosphere is thickest, create tiny obstacles for traveling light waves to navigate.
The light at the longest wavelengths—red, orange, and yellow—sails more easily over these atmospheric speed bumps, while the shorter blue and violet rays get bounced left and right as they journey towards us, in a process called "scattering."
At "solar noon," when the sun appears at its highest point in the daytime sky, light reaches us most directly, passing through less atmosphere on the way, reducing the scattering effect. When the spectrum remains together, the light we see is the familiar yellowish-white look of sunshine.
But as the Earth turns during the day and the sun drops toward the horizon, sunbeams enter the atmosphere at a slant and pass through a denser swath of air before they reach us. "When the short rays at the violet and blue end of the spectrum are deflected out in all directions, they can't get to our eyes," Nese notes, "while the orange and red wavelengths dominate our perception of the sky's color."
PLEASE look up KEplers laws and the Coriolis effect. Please stop listing to this idiota who can't provide you with data but think drawings are sufficient but it is not.
"Even if the Earth were a ball, their formula for measuring the curve doesn't make sense."
I can see you pulled up youtube videos that 'support' your facts, but some of the points are 'supported' also. The ability for people to mathematically determine where the planets are going to be works regardless. And if you've looked up flat earth videos, I'm sure you've seen the United Nations logo that shows the flat earth, and the moon and sun spinning around it.
Not bringing up any of your other excellent work, focusing only on this one topic, makes me wonder why your so convinced that your correct.
Here's a quick quote from a website.
"The fact is that everything that this President or any President says in his speeches are extremely well-choreographed. His speeches are always carefully written by speech writers in order to further some kind of agenda. There are no wasted words, and there are no spontaneous moments or accidental statements. The President of the United States is almost nothing more than an actor who reads the lines that he is given. We all know that there was one President who actually was a big-time Hollywood actor. The same holds true for all mainstream new media anchors, by the way."
President Obama mentioned the flat earth 'theory' 3 times in 4 years. Maybe, just maybe, like if everything else you write about, is an actor based reality, i mean really, wouldn't that be a pretty good dig? got the entire planet to believe that we live on a globe, when even the United Nations logo refuses to show a globe.
I am trying to reconcile two things: First is flying. We take off and fly to a "flight deck" of i.e., 33,000 feet. And when it is time to descend, the pressure in our collective ears tell us we are descending. Even the slightest change in altitude can be felt (either way) when in flight. However, all the while we are flying at the cruising altitude, there is never an "adjustment" over the many (sometimes) thousands of miles relative to the curve of the earth. That's what I'm ruminating about. Secondly, in respect to horizon, why does it only ever bend "one way" (i.e., west/east). If we were looking through binoculars and the boat "disappearing over the horizon", wouldn't the horizon adjust the four ways, not just two ways? We don't live on a cylinder. Yes, the earth is Uge, but common, there must be a mathematical equation that says after so many feet (not hundreds of miles,) the earth "bends". Earth is not a dodecahedron. At least I don't think it is. I've never been to space afore. Peace.
So let me get this straight you are not addressing any of the facts but yet you are basing you argument on a fucking logo? How about the fact that their logo doesnt show the north pole either? To try to argue the earth is flat the the big ball of the sun shines like a flash light is iditoc. the fact that if it were flat and the sun and moon orbit above us you would be able to see it with a telescope and it would never fucking set, lets not forgety that objects in the distance are smaller and grow in size as they get closer then small as they move away and neigher wdo the sun or moon do this. SO FLAT EARTH busted.
You try to say you can see a ship with optical devices SO MUST YOU BE ABLE TO DO THE SAME WITH THE SUN AND THE MOON. but you can't because they disappear beyond the horizon. THE SUN DOES NOT shine a flashlight and therefore you would never have nightfall if the earth was flat. SIMPLE OBSERVATIONS EASILY PROVE THE SPHEROID PLANET but the best example is the fact that the tornado spins opposite direction per each hemisphere AND HOLY SHIT GUESS WHAT ELSE DO TO? THE FUCKING STARS. Open your eyes and fuck what NASA says I don't need NASA to prove what is easily observable.
GO ahead try to tell me one thing that the flat earth people say is fact and ill show you the error in their example and the lie they push on you that you are overlooking.
It does bend four ways, but your eyes are not able to notice it since we are so small in relation to the size of what we see. We are a meer microscopic speck in relation so the size of the planet. What the flat earth people fail to comprehend is their argument that the horizon changes if you use binoculars. If their argument were accurate then technically you would be able to use a telescope and see europe. They also fail when it comes to explain when objects approach us they increase in size and decrease as they move away. the moon and sun do not do this (but they do but since they are so far away our eyes cant register it.) If they were close as they claim you would be able to see the size change.
Finally they fail with their diagrams of the sun projecting a beam of light to the ground like a focused flash light. The sun is a ball of radiant energy, so no matter the distance you would still see it shining 24/7 from the sides. UNLESS its so far away (which it is) that you see what we see when we look up at it.
I could go on and on with things such as the way the jet stream and wind patterns are formed at the equator but if people cant grasp these simple things then they wont understand them.
so you are saying the earth is the center of the universe and everything else is moving around it? Then how do you get the counter clockwise and opposite spin per hemisphere as seen with tornadoes? If we stood still how do you explain being able to predict to the exact second the phases of the moon and venus? Did you have a telescope as a child? Did you understand the lunar eclipse? Do you understand the wobble of the earths axis which causes the different tides per the lunar pull? You do understand the tide correct? You do know that it is different per where you are related to the equator and the tilt of the planet? If it were flat the tide would be the same globally. The moon I have issues with per its gravity but that is for another topic, but as for this argument you must understand the effects it has on the tides and this demonstrates once again the spherical shape of the spinning planet per the tidal differences at the equator and at the poles.