Flat Earth Debunked
You are incorrect as per your math and have no grasp on how large the earth is. But I don't need to argue with someone who can't understand what I'm explaining to them. So believe in a 600-year-old theory that has been proven wrong over and over again. Go watch a Foucault pendulum or the phases of the moon and then ask someone to explain it to you. Since you are having a hard time understanding the basics.
DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND the topic wasn't in the public for over 600 years. It was Hearst paying his writers to revive the 600 year old proven wrong theory. GET A CLUE.
There is NO proof whatsoever, that we live on a globe. I suspect WELLAWARE is a gatekeeper now. You guys arguing for a globe, who are you trying to convince????
Hi Ed, The infighting your flatearth arguments create seems a lot like what the Royals do to keep us running in place. These people came to your website because they saw truth there! seems you could approach it another way maybe? Now as for the tornadoes, WE know that the USA.inc & NASA use the weather as a weapon, they create it and guide it! spinning tornadoes and hurricanes at will. at --- weatherwar101.com -- it is explained in detail.Would you please be so kind and check his work out for us who still beleave in your work and tell us what you make of it! to use weather as a weapon allows them to borrow from the fed, sell gas, lumber, home depo wins, steel money with red cross, donations all over the networks! and blame mother nature!!! its a hell of a scam, weatherwar101,con or you tube as well. hope you look into it .Brian
It boggles my mind how these FES keep expecting to see a curve on the horizon. One's logic is supposed to be a test for falsehood. Also the Coriolis effect is something they can't really talk about
Like the analogy with the orange. The orange being the earth, if we rotate 360 degrees observing the horizon we would not see a curve it would be mathematically impossible, we would see a straight line. Logic is supposed to be a test for falsehood , and the curve fails miserably
Yeah, the orange is a good example. But the one thing that stops them in their tracks is to ask them when the sun or moon rise does it get bigger? Do they get smaller when they set? They have to if its a perspective issue but they don't so they are wrong about them being close/
@Jeran Campanella - Hey Jeran, go easy on the lemmings. It is much easier to awaken to a relatively recent government or media lie with just a little conflicting evidence like 911 WTC 7. The globe lie is a much more arduous maze to leave due to lifelong reinforcement, and the resulting cognitive dissonance. Contemporaries have been taught their whole life to trust "science". Additionally, negative reinforcement is employed by ridiculing anyone who dares to question the narrative. Just like with the virus and masks, most will never seek with an open mind to learn the truth until there is an official disclosure that is widely accepted. This probably won't happen in our lifetime unless some explorer makes it to the firmament barrier, survives the trip back, and escapes prison or assassination to provide evidence. Russia would have blown the whistle on the moon landing hoax a long time ago to embarrass the USA, but that would not reinforce the world wide FE/firmament coverup. To admit there is a firmament is to acknowledge God and His handiwork (Werner Von Braun's tombstone). A godless government certainly won't do it. Most "bible believers" don't have enough faith in God's word to accept bible proof. Why would any non-believing skeptic want to learn they have believed a lie their whole life, and acknowledge they have an omnipotent creator who they ought to worship?