Until my supreme court victory, there was no example in the books of a situation that tested the statute as it was written, therefore the law enforcement found themselves in a situation that they felt justified in their act of arresting a property owner (myself) while on shared ground that I owned, because the law lacked definition that would define a person as an owner of property even if they were a part owner of common property such as the common grounds of a condominium.
First, let me state that I did not set out to create this situation for myself that day, and was just obeying the law as it was written in the books that clearly allows a person to transport their handgun to and from their vehicle in a safe, secure manner. That’s what I was doing, but when I was asked to pause in my route to my vehicle, due to the HOA president of my complex was in fear of her life and asked me to stand by her and wait for police to arrive since she had encountered criminal activity on our property and the people responsible for that act were threatening her, I of course stood with her until the officers arrived and she was out of harms way. What happened next would take me on a journey that has ended in new case law being verified by the Supreme Court of Texas. I was arrested by the arriving officers who believed that I was unlawfully in having my handgun in a holster in plain view while I was walking to my vehicle from my place of residence.
I questioned the officer how I was to transport it to and from my vehicle if I didn’t have a concealed handgun license and would be violating the law if I was stopped while concealing my weapon. He told me it didn’t matter what I did, but It was not Arizona and to open carry in the state of Texas was illegal. I informed him of that:
1. I was not carrying it and was transporting it to my vehicle.
2. I was on my own property.
3. I provided him with my first name and gave him my address even though I had done nothing wrong to give him probable cause to detain me for questioning.
I allowed him to search my person due to the situation where a weapon was involved and clearly stated he may do so for his own safety. I was polite, and courteous with the officers and explained that I was not breaking the law and that I was not legally bound to provide them with my last name, and when questioned. I asked them what probable cause was there for them to detaining me for questioning. Their response was “How did they know I wasn’t a felon?” I ask them what does a felon look like and why would they assume that I possibly was one?. The officer responded with since I have broken the law by openly carrying a weapon, which I was in violation of the criminal code of Texas. I informed them a second time, POINTING TO MY VEHICLE, that I was in route to my vehicle with my weapon, and that it was being transported in a secure and safe manner, as clearly required by the statute.
They disagreed and was placed under arrest. Once I was told that I was under arrest, I complied by providing them with my last name so I would not be in violation of obstructing their investigation. When I was released from jail, I pulled the archive audio file between the officer and dispatch during the time when they were arresting me. To my surprise, there was no audio except for the officer notifying dispatch that they had one in custody and were transporting me to Lew Sterrett.
When I looked at the papers, the officers filed it turns out the officer used his cell phone to call the Dallas Fusion Center to obtain my personal information. THAT IN ITSELF SHOULD ALARM YOU since the fusion center is a privately run unregulated data center that houses your personal information.
Now, as per my side of the events that I have just told you, you will see the court transcripts of the officer’s testimony that will state I didn’t give them my name. That is not correct as I did give them my first name. I chose not to take the stand to correct them because the DA failed to meet the requirements that would enable them to find me guilty. I sometimes look back and wish I had, but the final results were in my favor, so I’m pleased regardless.
If the jury had followed their instructions I would have been found not guilty (as you see the higher up courts, state this) Their jury didn’t follow the law and based their judgment on the fact that I was a person refusing to identify myself to officers and running around with a gun. This is not even remotely close to what took place, but regardless the jury disregarded the instructions and gave an opinion that was incorrect. My lesson learned from that would be if you are facing a charge that a technicality or a strict understanding of the law clearly shows you are innocent, even though from the layman perspective who doesn’t know the law you would appear to be guilty, do not choose a jury to decide your fate, select a judge verdict instead. That’s just my opinion take it or leave it.
I was found guilty by a jury that day. That verdict was overturned on appeal to the next higher court. The DA appeal that ruling and we ended up arguing in front of the Supreme Court Of Texas when they affirmed my innocents.
How that decision affects you.
Up until that time a person who Co-owned property (let’s say for example a husband and wife Co-own a house and the land that it is on. If one of them were to walk outside their house with a handgun in a holster on their side as they walked to their car what was parked in their own driveway, an officer passing by could stop that property owner, question them, detain and arrest them for violation of the handgun legislation as it was written.
Yes, even if they were standing in their own driveway the Dallas County DA interpreted the law as you are not the owner of that property if you are a Co-owner, and since you can’t do what you want with the property, you are standing on, without the permission of the other owner, you are not in total control as the law stated you must be in.
Ludicrous, I know, but in reality that was the situation, up until my judgment was passed down by the highest court in the State of Texas.
Even the Justices that day presided that day questioned the DA about this scenario, just to be clear about the DA’s position defending an arrest as lawful and legitimate. The justices were visually disturbed that there was room to twist the statute in a way that gave them the impression they were justified in their arrest. Well, that was then. Today, thanks to my case, there is an example that can be used by others finding themselves in the same situation as I did, but more importantly, it gives you the owner of your property the right to open carry anywhere on that property you so choose. The case law is clear and is now on the books to be used to protect your rights.
My journey that day was unexpected and very expensive, to say the least. The way the legal system is set up, I seriously question if there isn’t a better way for a person to defend their innocence without having to spend $25,000 to do so. I was fortunate that the NRA chipped in and covered $5000 of the cost, but that left the balance, in my hands. The alternative of being found guilty and sentenced to a year in jail, was not an option since I had done nothing wrong and believe that I WAS following the law as it was written. I can imagine how many other people have experienced the same situation as I did, but they were unable to afford the price to pay to prove they were innocent as well. Not that I can afford it either, but found myself being supported by fans across the globe who sent me their support. Even with that support, I still have a balance owed to my lawyer (who is the best lawyer, I have ever had the pleasure of dealing with BTW!) So to help offset the cost this fund was created.
Those wanting to show their appreciation for my efforts that ended up with a now defined law that protects your rights on your property may do so via PayPal at the following link.
Thanks to everyone who has contributed to my cause, rest assured that I will continue fighting for the rights of the people till I am unable to physically fight the fight. That I promise you.
You can donate through this link. Thank you again for your support.