Your source for the facts the mainstream hides.

In August 1945, during the final stage of the Second World War, the United States dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The two bombings, officials claim, killed at least 129,000 people.

As the Second World War entered its sixth and final year, the Allies had begun to prepare for, what was anticipated to be, a very costly invasion of the Japanese mainland. This was preceded by an immensely destructive firebombing campaign that obliterated many Japanese cities. The war in Europe had concluded when Nazi Germany signed its instrument of surrender on May 8, 1945, but with the Japanese refusal to accept the Allies' demands for unconditional surrender, the Pacific War dragged on. Together with the United Kingdom and China, the United States calls for the unconditional surrender of the Japanese armed forces in the Potsdam Declaration on July 26, 1945, was buttressed with the threat of "prompt and utter destruction."

The Wellaware1.com REALITY check

Yes, I said HOAX. I will prove it to you via the photographs they showed to the public. They knew that the people would not be looking at the images as possible fakes, and would simply believe what they were told by the military industrial complex and their respective governments.

In addition to the lie that I will show you here, I want you to be aware of a vast number of phony photographs that exist in the national archives. I have photographic darkroom experience and an extensive background in image editing and the use of Photoshop. When you see an image that contains more than one focal point, you can say without a doubt it's been altered. With that knowledge, I suggest you search the archives for photos claiming to report damage from bombs being dropped, and you will find many that are frauds. Also, a significant amount of aerial photo showing Japans Navy at sea, is in reality, scale models. This is determined by observing the size of the water drops that are created as the waves crash on the bow of the ship. Those droplets would be a mist from the distance they claim, but you can see in the fraudulent images and movies the size of the droplets is gigantic and easily discernable. Impossible from that distance which means they are scaled models being filmed. If they were in fact mist. A higher speed camera is used, then replayed at normal speed which created the illusion of distance and that the image is larger than it is. Finally, know for a fact they had the technology to fly remotely aircraft using radio waves and a chase plane. They could not take off and land them with this technology so the pilots would parachute out after getting them into the air. President Roosevelts song was one of these trained pilots. Comes in handy when you are pioneering a visual lie as they played on the people by using these aircraft to shoot then them down all while they captured the footage perfectly framed in the movie camera lens. This also thoroughly debunks the claims of Kamakazi pilots since this would have been a fiction created to scare the enemy. This technology would be used to guide remotely a fighter plane into their target without the loss of a human pilot. Pearl Harbor anyone? I certainly think so.

 But back to the Atomic Lie...

I always had a difficult time understanding how a person from Asia would want to come to the US after we allegedly dropped an atomic weapon on their families. That in itself made me suspicious about the event, and therefore I decided to have a closer look. I never could find an angle to present my beliefs and back it up with scientific data to prove it. Then I watched a YouTube video that I believe the maker does a good job of making the case.


Picture found in Honkawa Elementary School in 2013 of the Hiroshima atom bomb cloud, believed to have been taken about 30 minutes after detonation from about 10 km (6.2 mi) east of the hypocenter

Why are the streets clear of any debris?

This is Japan.  Of course, we didn't drop a bomb on it, but I'm showing you its consistent with the cities they claim they dropped a bomb on.  Clearly we can see the buildings that were built with fire resistant material are still standing. In-between those buildings were residential houses and constructed with paper, wood, and clay. That's why they are burnt down and the other building are not. You can also see the small craters on the ground from the carpet bombing with incendiary devices that were the real reason for the city's destruction, not an atomic bomb. NOWHERE can you see signs of a single massive detonation that would be consistent with the use of an atomic bomb? CASE CLOSED.

These are the carpet bombing technique, using incendiary devices. You can see the small craters in the photo above. Nowhere do you see a large area that would lead you to believe a single point of a massive explosion?

On top of that, there is no rubble in the streets that would be consistent with an explosion.  The streets are clear.

Note the building that is standing are the structures that were built with fire resistant technologies. The rest in between those building were not, so they burnt down. If an atomic bomb were used, then it would level the city from a single point of detonation outward, and you would see damage lessen the further away from that point.

Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x