FLAT EARTH FOOLS
Some points that Flat earth people will not discuss are as follows:
1. If we are the center of the universe and the sun and moon spin around over us how are lunar eclipse possible?
2. Why can’t the people in the southern hemisphere see the stars that the northern hemisphere people can see?
3. How is there lunar phases?
4. How is it that Venus has phases?
5. How is it that the stars when viewed from the Southern hemisphere rotate in the opposite direction as they do in the Northern hemisphere?
6. IF the sun and moon were spinning around above us they would have to appear small then grow in size as they get over us then shrink again as they move away. They will show you a cloudy photo of the sun appears to do this but that is due to the clouds. they will never show you the moon because it does not start out small on the horizon and grow and it gets closer then get smaller as if moves away.
7. The big one is this. We can predict where planets are mathematically and you can then view them with the telescope. We can predict eclipses, we can predict phase changes and where satellites orbiting other planets are with math then go observe them right where they are supposed to be. The is what’s called a model. This model works now and works for all the astrological events in the future, do you know why we can predict this? Because the model is accurate and we know by observation which is something the flat earth people will refuse to even look up in the sky and realize their model cannot predict anything because it has nothing to base its existence on and cannot tell us the locations of other planets because their model does not work. That’s why it was thrown out so long ago.
What you are seeing is a push from the religious folks who are trying to bring the focus on man and god. You can tell these folks are those people just by how they argue. They spout off nonfacts because they can’t grasp concepts that are larger than they are. So let them cry and throw tantrums. Those of us who are smart and can comprehend the scientific data don’t have to worry about the actors that they use to try and attack us with. We see through their masks and will be bringing their game to an end soon.
Not that the people who push the flat Earth Bull will shut up after they see once again the facts that are easily observed with their own eyes. But I’ll let you see them cry all on their own as they throw a temper tantrum knowing their game is over. We know they are being paid by the Royals who own the media who profit from the propagation of the lie when you buy their books and video along with watch youtube clips with banner ads on them.
We know they are being paid by the Royals who own the media conglomerates who profit from the propagation of the lie when you buy their books and videos. Every time you click on another youtube video link you are providing them a profit.
HOW IT STARTED
My goal a few months ago was to find simple observable evidence that could prove without a doubt that in fact, we are on a spheroid-shaped planet.
The fools pushing the flat earth crap won’t let you use facts like Copernicus and the phases of Venus to prove the point. since they seem to think because Copernicus was a mason that the facts somehow don’t add up.
So I kept looking for evidence that could be evaluated by the average person without any special equipment. Then I realized observable evidence is the fact that tornados on the northern hemisphere spin opposite of those in the southern hemisphere
I see it as very easy to debunk simply by the fact that if you look at a tornado in the northern hemisphere and look at a tornado in the southern hemisphere. You will notice something is different. On one hemisphere, it rotates in one direction, and on the other hemisphere the opposite. If the earth were flat, it would spin in the same direction.
In Australia (The Southern Hemisphere) they rotate Clockwise. In the U.S. (The Northern Hemisphere.) They rotate counterclockwise. Here is your experiment If you grew up in the northern hemisphere, I want you to picture a tornado in your mind, note how it spins. It rotates counterclockwise. Here is a video to help you imagine it.
[embedyt] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6JL1W9wZHg[/embedyt]
Now watch this video and you immediately feel that something is wrong with it because you are used to seeing the tornado spin in a particular direction your entire life so you will notice it immediately.
[embedyt] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iv9nw5JmY4I[/embedyt]
This is because we are in different hemispheres of the globe and as a side note, the toilet flushing thing that’s a myth. It only spins like that because of the direction of the water is pushed into the bowl.
[embedyt] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9ksbh88OJs[/embedyt]
[embedyt] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGZEXkSX9wI[/embedyt]
[embedyt] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTBaOmJEQg0[/embedyt]
More Evidence we live on a spherical planet
Further proof we live on a sphere as you can see the spin of water rotates differently per the hemisphere it’s on. Thanks to Stef P for the video link.
[embedyt] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ghb8FQBBf4[/embedyt]
The next post I made
UPDATE Oct 11, 2016 @ 07:00
As a spheroid, you see the sun for 24 hours. You can’t if the earth is flat. This is proof. So all those who want to question it after viewing this video are either not very bright or in bed with those who are positioned to deceive others for personal gain.
[embedyt] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgZa9oZDN5g[/embedyt]
THE LATEST EVIDENCE THAT PROVES IT.
After putting some more thought into this situation it suddenly hit me.
If you are standing in the Northern hemisphere at the same time a person is standing you the Southern hemisphere and you both look at the moon. What will you see? You will see the moon from the perspective of that hemisphere and that means the moon will be flipped or opposite from the other person’s perspective.
Look at the largest crater Tycho (/ˈtaɪkoʊ/) is a prominent lunar impact crater located in the southern lunar highlands, named after the Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe (1546–1601).
Note it’s position. now look at the video from the other hemisphere and you will see the image is flipped because they are in the other hemisphere of the SPHERE planet. CASE CLOSED.
[embedyt] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmmyu88wMHw[/embedyt]
[embedyt] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3xokCzDwLI[/embedyt]
If you were thinking about giving money to these flat earth people I hope you have now rethought that decision. If you are looking to support someone who consistently shines the spotlight on the actors who are part of this lie consider supporting this site.
Another project we have scheduled is the collection of the airborne particulates known as chemtrails and bring a sample to the ground for testing. If you want to take part in that project you can via PayPal at [email protected]
It boggles my mind listening to some of the rants by these FEs , how they seem to think they should see a curve along the horizon. Using logic to weed through falsehoods, it blows me away how some of these folks buy into this. I’m thinking of the video where he uses the analogy with the orange . They also want address the swirling effect of water north & south & center of the equator
I am trying to reconcile two things: First is flying. We take off and fly to a “flight deck” of i.e., 33,000 feet. And when it is time to descend, the pressure in our collective ears tell us we are descending. Even the slightest change in altitude can be felt (either way) when in flight. However, all the while we are flying at the cruising altitude, there is never an “adjustment” over the many (sometimes) thousands of miles relative to the curve of the earth. That’s what I’m ruminating about. Secondly, in respect to horizon, why does it only ever bend “one way” (i.e., west/east). If we were looking through binoculars and the boat “disappearing over the horizon”, wouldn’t the horizon adjust the four ways, not just two ways? We don’t live on a cylinder. Yes, the earth is Uge, but common, there must be a mathematical equation that says after so many feet (not hundreds of miles,) the earth “bends”. Earth is not a dodecahedron. At least I don’t think it is. I’ve never been to space afore. Peace.
It does bend four ways, but your eyes are not able to notice it since we are so small in relation to the size of what we see. We are a meer microscopic speck in relation so the size of the planet. What the flat earth people fail to comprehend is their argument that the horizon changes if you use binoculars. If their argument were accurate then technically you would be able to use a telescope and see europe. They also fail when it comes to explain when objects approach us they increase in size and decrease as they move away. the moon and sun do not do this (but they do but since they are so far away our eyes cant register it.) If they were close as they claim you would be able to see the size change.
Finally they fail with their diagrams of the sun projecting a beam of light to the ground like a focused flash light. The sun is a ball of radiant energy, so no matter the distance you would still see it shining 24/7 from the sides. UNLESS its so far away (which it is) that you see what we see when we look up at it.
I could go on and on with things such as the way the jet stream and wind patterns are formed at the equator but if people cant grasp these simple things then they wont understand them.
AND your adjustment again is so so so small that we cant detect it. Again yes you live on a cylinder, just one that wraps in both directions. 😉
Here is a video with the math that explains your perspective change of about 3 degrees at 30K. But remember your horizon increases as you get higher. The angles from which the horizon appear expand equally. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-W6JuyClxZg
Glad i found this, i was just arguing with a flat earther on youtube lastnight lol…Thank You
When the flat earthers say they can see the ship that has passed over the horizon when they use binoculars, then technically they should be able to stand on an elevated surface with a telescope and track the ship across the ocean till it reaches Hawai. ALSO by their own claims then when the sun sets behind the horizon you should be able to use binoculars to then keep tracking it. But you can’t because the earth is not flat.
Atmospheric lensing. The air isn’t nothing.
I cant help but laugh that in the paragraph (and probably rest of the article) where you are specifically talking about how smart globe heads are and how stupid anyone that believes in religion is, your entire text is full of typos. I am not normally one to point out typos, but when you are trying to convince the world of how smart you and other people that buy the spinning globe rhetoric, you might want to actually use correct grammar and spelling, lol, just saying, it certainly doesn’t help your case.
Where? And if you think typos make the facts any less factual then you are reaching.
Dear Mr Chiarini,
I am a new member and I believe the Earth is round and concave, and motionless.
This attained closure emerges from literature that I inspect currently. It is a new announcement which enticed me with its validity.
I will not reveal its name to you for fear of derision.
Regardless!
I admire and respect your work. However I will need time to be convinced of its efficacy.
For the moment, I remain neutral but extremely interested.
I do immerse you in deference.
Respectfully,
winner25.
so you are saying the earth is the center of the universe and everything else is moving around it? Then how do you get the counter clockwise and opposite spin per hemisphere as seen with tornadoes? If we stood still how do you explain being able to predict to the exact second the phases of the moon and venus? Did you have a telescope as a child? Did you understand the lunar eclipse? Do you understand the wobble of the earths axis which causes the different tides per the lunar pull? You do understand the tide correct? You do know that it is different per where you are related to the equator and the tilt of the planet? If it were flat the tide would be the same globally. The moon I have issues with per its gravity but that is for another topic, but as for this argument you must understand the effects it has on the tides and this demonstrates once again the spherical shape of the spinning planet per the tidal differences at the equator and at the poles.
I am suspicious of all the attention you gave to this matter, yet still resort to the ad hominem attacks used for time immemorial to shut arguments down. What you are doing is right out of the playbook to shut down conspiracy theorists.
You probably should leave this issue alone - your controlled opposition is showing.
The claims you made in saying what flat-Earthers refuse to discuss is outright false, and even a cursory search on YouTube would demonstrate that. And that does not include the claims you made that are just bullshit.
So this Website is either controlled opposition, or you have not done enough research on this matter, and are not qualified to argue it.
We can argue this, if you want. I will either expose you, or enlighten you.
Because this issue has evidence so conclusive that there is no longer any argument as to whether or not the Earth is flat or not. There is only the issue of getting others to realize that there is a lie told so long and sold so deep that nearly no one will even consider the absolute proof staring them right in the face.
Moon from Antartica taken with an SLR camera https://triptoantarctica.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/antarctic-moon1.jpg
Look different from what you are used to? Go ahead and say no so I can call you a liar.
Now play dumb and say it’s faked, Then try to tell us that all the thousands of photos you can google from antarctica that show the moon are ALL fake, so we can laugh at you.
Something fishy about all this,the earth is a plain,flat and the firmament just as it says in the bible does not allow nada to go anywhere.but idosent matter,flat,PARE SHAPED or round SATAN IS IN CONTROL and argueing and bickering gets us nowhere.the earth is flat ,god created it and jesus is our savior.peace and godbless.ps lies are used to hide lies then lies to start a lie ALLLL OVER AGAIN.
I sail, I plot courses, I chart. I can see way way waaaay beyond the mathmatical curve. It’s either flat or much much larger than they tell us. An observation; place a sundial on a flat earth map and it works, place a pin into a globe and using a light - it doesn’t act like a sundial on a ball. It doesn’t work.
Have a friend send you a photo of the moon from the southern hemisphere. Then tell me it’s flat.
how many balldrinkers…hahaha
but ppl are awakening 😀
Moon from Antartica https://triptoantarctica.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/antarctic-moon1.jpg
Drops mic.
The point is,everyone is that this man is saving your life by telling the TRUTH..Its like being totally sabotaged and betrayed,but wouldn’t you rather know than not??? Its refreshing for a guy like me to know I’m not crazy OR alone…thank you Edward…You’re a good cat…
No problem. If it were flat and the evidence backs it up I would be saying its flat. Either way it makes no difference to me but the facts are facts like it or not. So thanks for the comment, and anyone unwilling to listen to the evidence is no one you should waste your time talking to because they will never accept any evidence. That is a good thing because its a method of filtering out close minded irrational and illogical thinking people.
explain how the time lapse photos of the stars around the north pole would even be possible on a TILTED SPINNING BALL. Seriously your “proof” of viewing an item spinning in different directions can happen in one room walking from one side to another.
You don’t grasp the distance we are to the stars. Just like when you are driving and you look out the side of your window and see things moving by, they move by faster the closer they are to you. the further away they are the less movement you see. The stars are SO EFFING FAR away your eye can’t pickup the little movement that is taking place.
midnight sun in norway? no way, baby. not tilted, spinning. you don’t grasp your illegitimate sense of superiority or misinfo is your aim here. i’m not coming back to your website again, but i feel bad for the people who do.
I can see you pulled up youtube videos that ‘support’ your facts, but some of the points are ‘supported’ also. The ability for people to mathematically determine where the planets are going to be works regardless. And if you’ve looked up flat earth videos, I’m sure you’ve seen the United Nations logo that shows the flat earth, and the moon and sun spinning around it.
Not bringing up any of your other excellent work, focusing only on this one topic, makes me wonder why your so convinced that your correct.
Here’s a quick quote from a website.
“The fact is that everything that this President or any President says in his speeches are extremely well-choreographed. His speeches are always carefully written by speech writers in order to further some kind of agenda. There are no wasted words, and there are no spontaneous moments or accidental statements. The President of the United States is almost nothing more than an actor who reads the lines that he is given. We all know that there was one President who actually was a big-time Hollywood actor. The same holds true for all mainstream new media anchors, by the way.”
President Obama mentioned the flat earth ‘theory’ 3 times in 4 years. Maybe, just maybe, like if everything else you write about, is an actor based reality, i mean really, wouldn’t that be a pretty good dig? got the entire planet to believe that we live on a globe, when even the United Nations logo refuses to show a globe.
So let me get this straight you are not addressing any of the facts but yet you are basing you argument on a fucking logo? How about the fact that their logo doesnt show the north pole either? To try to argue the earth is flat the the big ball of the sun shines like a flash light is iditoc. the fact that if it were flat and the sun and moon orbit above us you would be able to see it with a telescope and it would never fucking set, lets not forgety that objects in the distance are smaller and grow in size as they get closer then small as they move away and neigher wdo the sun or moon do this. SO FLAT EARTH busted.
You try to say you can see a ship with optical devices SO MUST YOU BE ABLE TO DO THE SAME WITH THE SUN AND THE MOON. but you can’t because they disappear beyond the horizon. THE SUN DOES NOT shine a flashlight and therefore you would never have nightfall if the earth was flat. SIMPLE OBSERVATIONS EASILY PROVE THE SPHEROID PLANET but the best example is the fact that the tornado spins opposite direction per each hemisphere AND HOLY SHIT GUESS WHAT ELSE DO TO? THE FUCKING STARS. Open your eyes and fuck what NASA says I don’t need NASA to prove what is easily observable.
GO ahead try to tell me one thing that the flat earth people say is fact and ill show you the error in their example and the lie they push on you that you are overlooking.
and it’s ONLY possible on a tilted spinning ball.
O that’s so cool
Jack
Ok you are clearly smart enough do what ever that was but you must have realized that they are people smart enough to see that you are not trying to teach but indoctrinate please try and put out something helpful without your buyis
What a f cking Jack off how about making a video starting with out your opinion and just the facts couldn’t even watch them dumb ass !!!!!!!! Try again
What would be my opinion? Do you even understand the basics about the observable facts? Do you understand there are such things as lunar eclipse right? That cant happens in your flat earth model. You also understand as things get farther away from you they get smaller. So show me the moon that gets larger as it rises in the sky then gets smaller as it sets. You will try to show the sun (without understanding the images you will show have clouds in them and the refractions will cause the sun to appear to get larger but in a clears shy that does not happen.) But you won’t talk about that now, will you?
Well how do you explain trees with calm leaves on a earth that’s supposed to be rotating 1,030 MPH?
And in response to this statement “I see it as very easy to debunk simply by the fact that if you look at a tornado in the northern hemisphere and look at a tornado in the southern hemisphere. You will notice something is different. On one hemisphere, it rotates in one direction, and on the other hemisphere the opposite. If the earth were flat, it would spin in the same direction.”
Anticyclonic tornadoes prove that idea to be false. I don’t think the earth is technically flat, but I do believe the PLANEt we live on is a plane (leveled surface)
Do you understand that space is a void? there is nothing to cause friction or particles to interact with. Do you see the fly inside your vehicle that while you drive 55 mph it flys from the back seat to the front, is it traveling faster the 55? Yes, it is but you don’t know it is because you are traveling the same speed. You can see the effects of the movement with Foucault pendulum. It’s a very easy experiment to observe the movement of the earth and the fly being the pendulum which is affected by the earth movement and you can see it as it swings and changes its direction by the EXACT degree that is mathematically PRECISE to the movement of the earth. You should try it some time. Go to The Franklin Institute in Philly where they have a large one.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foucault_pendulum
The same way a fly is sitting on your dash as you travel 100mph
No, you can’t compare something in a moving car not flying to the back because the kinetic energy is being blocked (windows, door, anything that keeps wind energy from getting through), unlike a tree that is not being blocked by anything. If the windows were open, the fly would move in the direction of the kinetic energy
Yeah no shit because if you were in a car in space you wouldn’t need the windshield because there is nothing for you to be shielded from. Duh
Hey Ed. I wanted to post this on this thread http://www.wellaware1.com/the-flat-earth-nonsense-a-royal-creation/ but there was no reply box.
Looking at the “Dan Pratt” character in that link I couldn’t help but instantly think of him when I saw the murderer of UK MP Jo Cox “Thomas Mair” in this link. http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-37997235
No its not him but I know that guys face. Give me a little bit to let is sink in but I do know he is an actor.
I looked at the flat earth info and came to the conclusion the earth is round . Thanks Ed for your input on the matter. For all you people sitting on the fence about this I would like your opinion on this, at sun rise and sun set what I see when there are clouds is the sun rays streaming upwards through the clouds . If the earth is flat and the sun is stationary above the earth how do the sun rays appear to be going up into the sky. Do you think it is possible for the sun rays to stream upwards if the earth is flat?
They are called Crepuscular and Anti Crepuscular rays .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t30-YbayyXE
Zondar . . . the main thing that you and others alike, aren’t seeing, in regards to the shape of our earth, is that it is scripturally based. The Bible does not lie and for this reason alone one should have no problem believing the earth is geocentric. It is in fact stationary. The sun, moon and stars circle above the (one level surface) earth. Of course if your not a believer in Jesus Christ, you obviously will find all of this hard to receive. I suggest you research some of the verses that speak about the “ends, sides, foundations, pillars and corners” of the earth. It’s important to note that the sun, moon and stars weren’t brought onto the scene until the 4th day. And then it says they were placed (in) the firmament. Anyone can look at the sun and moon and see that they are not that far away. Of course I believed the lie for many years, just like all others, only because we were conditioned to. Many do not understand that the devil literally deceives the whole world, as shown in Revelation 12:9. Even though he is a defeated foe, he’s still entitled to his free reign as god of this world, 1 Cor. 4:4. His time is short though. Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ!
First off You need to remove yourself from the conditioned state you are in. Its a fucking book. Written by royal assholes as a means to control the peasants. People LIE, BOOKS DON’T SAY ANYTHING. THEY ARE WORDS PRINTED BY ROYAL LIARS ON THEIR ROYAL PRINTING PRESSES> Don’t believe me then why is there a copyright on the bible and its LONDON ENGLAND? You are free to distribute the book anywhere on the planet EXCEPT London England.
Once you come to grips with that and stop trying to use that fiction as something other then the observable scientific methods that prove without the need for some government agency then you can come back and play.
Sorry Dallas, but how would you explain “your existence” if you don’t believe in an actual Divine Creator?
Please understand that there are some things that DO require faith!
By the way, you do have some incredible talent, but I wouldn’t recommend you allowing that to go to your head, without first giving credit where credit is due. And that would be to simply give Glory to God, which is the One who originally placed that gifting within you, when he created you.
Just in case you weren’t aware of your existence, allow me to say that God did know you before He formed you in your mother’s womb. You are fearfully and wonderfully made! Blessings my friend!!
MY RESPONSE.
I don’t have to know things lie that to know what is right and what is wrong on this planet. You on the other hand cant cope with the fact that life has always been here and will always be here. You need some extraterrestrial purpose for your life. I look within.
Dallasgoldbug
NASA is fraudulent and so is their evidence and manipulated mathematics. Show me an actual picture of Earth, other planets, or a satellite. You cant because its all CGI bs or an artist conceptual drawing. Nice try.
Sorry but you are a typical flatearther who cant address the fact that are observable which I have provided. If you want to bash the frauds at nasa you can do so on the nasa page. Address the 360 degree sun at the top of the page.
https://www.flat-earth-moon-phases.com/what-causes-a-lunar-eclipse
1 The Sunlight goes through the strong magnetic field of the north pole, and the sunlight turns orange. And that light then hits the moon.
haha haha haha
2. Since the sunlight is orange, it makes the moon appear orange as in this image-
The sunlight is not orange That atmosphere is made up of a mixture of gaseous molecules, mostly nitrogen and oxygen, with some water vapor and trace gasses thrown in. These molecules clumped more densely close to Earth where the atmosphere is thickest, create tiny obstacles for traveling light waves to navigate.
The light at the longest wavelengths—red, orange, and yellow—sails more easily over these atmospheric speed bumps, while the shorter blue and violet rays get bounced left and right as they journey towards us, in a process called “scattering.”
At “solar noon,” when the sun appears at its highest point in the daytime sky, light reaches us most directly, passing through less atmosphere on the way, reducing the scattering effect. When the spectrum remains together, the light we see is the familiar yellowish-white look of sunshine.
But as the Earth turns during the day and the sun drops toward the horizon, sunbeams enter the atmosphere at a slant and pass through a denser swath of air before they reach us. “When the short rays at the violet and blue end of the spectrum are deflected out in all directions, they can’t get to our eyes,” Nese notes, “while the orange and red wavelengths dominate our perception of the sky’s color.”
PLEASE look up KEplers laws and the Coriolis effect. Please stop listing to this idiota who can’t provide you with data but think drawings are sufficient but it is not.
Sorry Ed, but what exactly does a pendulum prove? And how is this good evidence?
OMG, Look it up. It mathematically shows the spin of the planet. MATHEMATICALLY.
Lookup Fulcrum
I love this guy Goldbug for the evidence and analysis he presents. I think the globe may be proved by some motion picture films taken from orbiting vehicles… this was at least a couple decades before the CGI capability was it not?. What they (NASA) do NOT seem to prove is that space craft have actually left earth orbit…. or what the stars and sun actually look like once you escape the atmosphere There can be a LOT of profit margin in fraud… That is Defense contractors having to actually produce working missions. Aerospace or Military defense businesses are very compartmentalized due to classified nature… and ‘need to know’ security arrangements.
It would seem to be an ‘electric universe’. An inquiring mind would likely be interested in what Eric P Dollard (sort of a Tesla v 2.0 has to say not only about the additional dimensions and aspects of what we know as ‘electricity’. The High Priesthood of AstroPhysics provides little of value on this topic of the Cosmology of our micro- or macrocosm (if I am using the word correctly)
You are blinded by your own ignorance and determined to defend it even though the the three videos that i posted on this page show you the MATH that you can do yourself (WITHOUT NASA, WITHOUT A TELESCOPE, WITHOUT A VIDEO) just YOU your EYES and the observable proof that is scientifically mathematically provable.
You can’t even understand the lunar eclipse and how the CURVE of our planet creates the shadow
If the planet were flay and as you idiots claim the sun and the moon are flying around in a circle and you claim the reason they disapear is due to perspective then you fail because the objects the travel away from us due to perspective get smaller but the OBSERVABLE MOON AND SUN DONT.
You have no understanding of perspective and how large this planet is. You lace the ability to understand what facts and math prove because you are part of a culture that is being run by a bunch of actors who are paid hollow souls that suck the life from you and cause you to spin in circles and attack anyone your little brain can’t understand.
Now if you would like to make an argument as per why I’m wrong then you better be specific and list out your facts by number so we can all follow your song and dance as I will show you your error. WITHOUT NASA. WITHOUT VIDEO FROM SOME SATELLITE.
Lol the water spinning is not true. So there goes your credibility. Any more false statements ? It’s obvious it’s flat. I can observe this when I go outside haha. You have to be an absolute blind fool to believe otherwise.
You are observing the fact that you are so small (just like your brain capacity) that you don’t even understand the massive size of the planet (DO YOU UNDERSTAND YOU CAN ONLY SEE SO FAR BECAUSE OF THE CURVE OF THE PLANET. BUT THAT CURVE IS SO FUCKING SLIGHT THAT YOU CAN’T SEE IT BECAUSE YOU ARE SO CLOSE TO THE GROUND AND ITS MASSIVE? No you have no idea what I’m talking about because you are not smart enough or willing to look at the facts.
Do you understand how the LUNAR ECLIPSE is formed? That’s when WE THE EARTH come in between the sun and the moon. DO YOU SEE THE CURVED SHADOW THAT CROSSED THE MOON BECAUSE THE SUN IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE EARTH AND CASTING THE SHADOW ON THE MOON?
Therefore you sir are an idiot if you still believe the earth is flat. You are full of incorrect information. bad math, inability to comprehend perspective and size and or possibly one of the bullshit artist trying to take up people’s time and cause them to look like the fools you are acting like.
“Even if the Earth were a ball, their formula for measuring the curve doesn’t make sense.”
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=65566.0
correct
P.S. WWI might better spend his time digging into the
genealogies of the likes of LENIN relation - -Leo DiCAPRIO
and so many other of our public elites - -as the 100th anniversary
of the Bolshevik revolution swiftly approaches.
Why would I care about that? I have exposed lennon and the Roosevelt connection. I dont have time to track down every actor’s baby momma. Let me know when Leo runs for office then Ill be interested.
AGAIN — - -
Kubrick’s ‘2001’ is an inside joke confession that ‘space travel’
and space itself as represented by ‘psy-ants’ - -is a HOAX.
TAKE another look.
Startling, but undeniable as things unfold all around us.
ITS A FUCKING MOVIE. SHUT IT.
Amazing how hurt people get when you present them with facts. I can’t believe we are even talking about this Dark Age sh*t in the current year.
Very true. Its a religious push that is behind this crap. You can tell by how they argue. Saying they KNOW when they dont have a clue. Never looking at the evidence which is clear. Phases of venus Moon phases, lunar eclipse etc etc. they just can’t get it through their little brains how large this planet really is.
Really? I am so sad to see that this is the crap you do believe Ed.
I’m sorry but I don’t BELIEVE in anything. you examine the facts and make a decision. Leave faith-based hocus pocus at the door.
I have a suggestion. Let’s stop being distracted by this flat Earth vs. globe Earth argument. We can see here in this comment section how brilliantly it works as a divisive wedge. Ed’s work, which reveals these costumed made up actors that are appearing in the news stories on our televisions, is brilliant and valuable. This is a waste of all of our time. Can any of us get in our private rocket ships and fly high enough into the atmosphere to confirm with our own eyes any of these statements being debated here? Flat Earth vs. Globe Earth is a circle jerk argument which always ends up at the same place and never resolves itself. In other words, a giant distraction.
How about we just let this one go and get back to revealing the a**holes that are causing so many problems in our world.
don’t need a spaceship when we have something as simple as a pendulum
Copernicus may have been a mason, but that is not why they refuse to hear it is it? or is it that he used confirmation techniques to mathematically to prove his point. I am certain the folklore crowd prefer to promote ignorance and arrogance instead of reason and science. all the best Ed and team.
Let’s not forget the pendulum as well mathematically shows the movement of the planet.
A very special pendulum, we should all learn more about, the Foucault Pendulum, was engineered to operate independent of any earthly motion. If that is reliable, the pendulum is the single means I know of verifying a regular motion of the Earth. But how would that work with other unusual geophysical form, such as a toroid or donut shape. I am having problems taking all this in because of the unusual people dedicated to the exploration of the poles-Admiral Richard E. Byrd, Andrea Barnes, and another man, just recently deceased from a solo trek across the Antarctic.
Yes I used to love going to the Franklin Institute as a kid and watching their Foucault pendulum
aside from you being pictured in the sheriff handbook you pull from so often…. this has to be one of the most concerning things ever outta you officer bug…
What are you talking about? You are a child. Grow up before I spank you.
Not much “evidence” for a spinning ball, spinning at 1024mph, hurling around the sun at 67,000mph, the solar system spinning at 514,000mph. I wonder what new spinning motions they’ll come up with next. Sorry, I like and appreciate your work, but not on this subject. You might wan’t to spend a year or so researching everything, and all sides of the subject and all experiments, and all the evidence before coming to your conclusions.
wow what a bias and unsubstantiated comment. There is no evidence at all for what you spew. so you lose either way, no matter what you say, folk aren’t as stupid as you want them to become, [by using those medieval folklore cogitations to trick them]. you are either deceived by their lies, or you are a troll, drone, clone or phony. we shall see; he offered irrefutable proof, you scoffed as if it was trivial. that shows you are not who you say or think you are. simply due to the fact that you do not acknowledge any factual aspect of what he said, presented or offered. nor did you do any independent testing or observational research to offer any possible retort that could maintain any credibility… I call shenanigans on you for ignoring and downplaying factual evidence! that makes you a non-authority in any group that maintains integrity! all the best to you and yours
CHIARINI is BALKING the unfold with this one
Jay WEIDNER unmasked ‘The SHINING’ as a confession of the FAKE moon
landings. But, he too, BALKED the full revelation.
Kubrick’s ‘2001’ is, in fact, a tongue and cheek joke on the HOAX of ‘space
travel’ itself. Note the circle jerk erotic subtexts to the first space station
docking. Note how, once on the moon, the effects suddenly get noticeably
less convincing. Catch the bathroom joke laid right before the big moon
surface confrontation with the monolith.
And then, once in space, it all gets campy - -ends with a deprogrammer’s
light show - -and ends in a windowless FAKE Louis IV hotel suite
- — and —FINALLY— a good meal.
All this culminates is heading back to the womb - -back to the earth
- - - and BACK to the drawing board of INTEL RUN reality creation.
CHECK IT OUT
Quoting a movie is like saying you say donald duck as hitler so you know hes disney. ITS A FUCING MOVIE do you not understand why movies are made? TO MAKE A FUCKING PROFIT FROM THEM. Do you think acting is real? You must because you think because a script and actors say something that it must mes its real. ITS A FUCKING MOVIE I DON’T CARE WHAT SOME HOLLYWOOD DIRECTOR PUTS IN HIS FILMS THAT HE KNOWS WILL CAUSE YOU FOOLS TO CHANGE YOUR LIVES AND VOMIT WHAT EVER NON SCIENCE ILLUSIONS BULLSHIT THEY CREATE IN THE STUDIO AND TELL YOU ITS REAL AS A MARKETING PLOY.
Let me guess you were one of those fools running around saying The Blair Witch movie was real? hahahaha
STOP QUOTING MOVIES AS REALITY. I dont care if they claim they are or are trying to tell you some secret. THEY ARE MOVIES AND THAT MEANS FOR ENTERTAINMENT.
When will you expose which actor is Neil Tyson Degrasse? Bill Nye?
Already did. UTFSE
Ed, I admire your work, I am a paying member of this site. I have to disagree with you on this subject as many others have. With all due respect whilst I respect your investigations I am concerned that you reach that conclusion. I do not believe we are on a spinning globe etc I have studied it for a long time now and reject any globe earth model. respect to you and your works.
Ed, do you have any information on Dick Gregory, I am not convinced by him and saw a link but no real description of him, linked to Mandela, cosby, pryor, King, etc . Do you have anything further on him?
Being a Spheriod Satisfies virtually all of the Observed Phenomena but the earth could actually be a pretzel an there’s not 1fuk any of us could do about it so all this flat shit is simply set-up , interference & distraction
Correct. It’s just another means for them to scam the public into buying their books and dvds along with dividing the public. That’s how the Royals do it.
Wow man. Always loved you’re stuff, havent been here in a couple months. Really came by to look for any biometrics on the body doubles of Clinton but instead find this.
You’re the one that sounds like a shill for the Royals even though I know you’ve been exposing them. I know youre not one. But they are the ones that used Copernicus to change the flat earth model to the globe model. They are the ones paying to discredit the truth of the flat earth movement. So either you’re a shill or you’ve completely missed the mark here.
Either way, there’s no excuse for your tone. You’re better than that.
Bite me. AND WHILE YOU’RE AT IT FUCK OFF. I dont owe you anything especially after you insult me. Your words are dead to me.
Bla, bla…! Toungue bla…!
The keys to my Honda…!!!
RbM
Why aren’t the moon phases enough to show the earth’s roundness? Clearly the conjunction of earth and moon create the “new moon.” As the spheres move the moon becomes visible first as a crescent due to the ROUND earth still shadowing most of it. As the shadow moves off the crescent grows larger but is still a crescent for most of the time until it becomes full. You know that it is full when it rises just as much ythe sun goes down, showing that the earth no longer obstructs the view of it.
Perhaps flat earthers have an explanation for this other than what is, to me, clearly obvious. We all have our reality. Let them have theirs if it makes them happy. It is useless to attempt to convince anyone of anything. The more you argue, the more steadfast they will stay. All of us, no matter what we believe, will hang onto our beliefs until we are ready to change them-or not.
Actually the shadow is not due to the earth. It is during a lunar eclipse biut that the only time. Its due to the spherical shape of the moon and its orbit around the earth.
But at least you are thinking.
Ed, have you seen Robert Bassanos work, hes an actual physics student who actually calls up NASA officials and debunks a lot of the hubble and sattelite stuff, with actual documentation! his youtube chanel is planetaveritas, its very insighful stuff.
No, never heard of him but don’t need to look at it I already debunked NASA years ago and continue to do so.
The earth is not a planet. NASA is a satanic freemason lie, research David Wardlaw Scott, Edward Hendrie and Rob Skiba.
Do not ever in your life say that people like me, a Christian, are working for the elite in regards to a flat earth lie.
You are a liar to say the earth is not flat and I will take you and anyone else on publicly in this matter and you will lose. Period.
Read the Complete Jewish Bible and find the word “dome” if you are such a good researcher in truth.
You have some good content.
I repeat, you are a liar. The earth is not a globe. The heavens revolve in the dome of the sky, not the earth.
Do yourself a favor and look into it:
David Wardlaw Scott
Edward Hendrie
Rob Skiba
Ephesians 5:11
You sound like a stable person. Seek professional help and stop attacking people you dont know.
Wow
Can’t help them